Tomorrow's Research Today
Tomorrow's Research Today
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, COMPENSATION & PENSION LAW ABSTRACTS
Sponsored by Pension Governance, LLC
Vol. 9, No. 18: May 08, 2008

PAMELA J. PERUN, EDITOR
Policy Director, Aspen Institute - Initiative on Financial Security
pamela@planetnow.com

Click here to browse ALL abstracts for this journal
 

Announcements

Pension Governance, LLC is an independent information and business consulting services and research/analysis company for the pension community. News, interviews, white papers, surveys, training and industry events provide pension decision-makers, their attorneys, actuaries, auditors, consultants, money managers and third party administrators with information that is straightforward and created with investment fiduciary best practices in mind. To learn more, please visit http://www.pensiongovernance.com, http://www.pensionriskmatters.com (blog) and http://www.pensionlitigationdata.com.


Topic of This Issue:
Retirement

Table of Contents

Net Worth and Housing Equity in Retirement

Todd M. Sinai, University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Nicholas S. Souleles, University of Pennsylvania - Finance Department, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Mandatory Retirement and Faculty Retirement Decisions

Robert L. Clark, Affiliation Unknown
Linda S. Ghent, Affiliation Unknown

How Do Immigrants Fare in Retirement

Purvi Sevak, Hunter College
Lucie Schmidt, Williams College

The Effects of Health Insurance and Self-Insurance on Retirement Behavior

Eric French, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
John Bailey Jones, State University of New York

Housing Wealth and Retirement Timing

Martin Farnham, University of Victoria - Economics
Purvi Sevak, Hunter College

The Retirement Consumption Puzzle: Actual Spending Change in Panel Data

Michael D. Hurd, The RAND Corporation, SUNY at Stony Brook University, College of Arts and Science, Department of Economics, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Susann Rohwedder, The RAND Corporation



EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, COMPENSATION & PENSION LAW ABSTRACTS
Sponsored by Pension Governance, LLC

"Net Worth and Housing Equity in Retirement" Free Download


FRB of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 07-33

TODD M. SINAI, University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Email: sinai@wharton.upenn.edu
NICHOLAS S. SOULELES, University of Pennsylvania - Finance Department, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Email: Souleles@wharton.upenn.edu

This paper documents the trends in the life-cycle profiles of net worth and housing equity between 1983 and 2004. The net worth of older households significantly increased during the housing boom of recent years. However, net worth grew by more than housing equity, in part because other assets also appreciated at the same time. Moreover, the younger elderly offset rising house prices by increasing their housing debt, and used some of the proceeds to invest in other assets. We also consider how much of their housing equity older households can actually tap, using reverse mortgages. This fraction is lower at younger ages, such that young retirees can consume less than half of their housing equity. These results imply that 'consumable' net worth is smaller than standard calculations of net worth.

"Mandatory Retirement and Faculty Retirement Decisions" Fee Download


Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Vol. 47, Issue 1, pp. 153-163, January 2008

ROBERT L. CLARK, Affiliation Unknown
LINDA S. GHENT, Affiliation Unknown

As a result of the 1986 Age Discrimination in Employment Act, colleges and universities were no longer allowed to impose mandatory retirement on faculty members at age seventy after 1994. This paper estimates the change in retirement rates of faculty before and after the ending of mandatory retirement using data from the University of North Carolina (UNC) system. The analysis reveals a sharp decline in the probability of faculty at UNC retiring at age seventy once the university was unable to impose forced retirement.

"How Do Immigrants Fare in Retirement" Free Download


Michigan Retirement Research Center Research Paper No. UM WP 2007-169

PURVI SEVAK, Hunter College
Email: psevak@hunter.cuny.edu
LUCIE SCHMIDT, Williams College
Email: lschmidt@williams.edu

Existing literature suggests that immigrants receive lower wages than U.S. born workers with similar characteristics. This could imply that immigrant households would enter retirement at a significant financial disadvantage. In this paper, we examine the retirement resources available to immigrant families by examining Social Security benefits, pension coverage, and private wealth accumulation. Our results suggest that although immigrant families may be financially better-off in the U.S. than in their native countries, they do enter retirement at a significant financial disadvantage relative to native born households with similar characteristics.

"The Effects of Health Insurance and Self-Insurance on Retirement Behavior" Free Download


FRB Chicago Working Paper No. 2001-19
Michigan Retirement Research Center Research Paper No. UM WP 2007-170

ERIC FRENCH, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
Email: eric.french@frbchi.org
JOHN BAILEY JONES, State University of New York
Email: jbjones@albany.edu

This paper provides an empirical analysis of the effect of employer-provided health insurance and Medicare in determining retirement behavior. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, we estimate the first dynamic programming model of retirement that accounts for both saving and uncertain medical expenses. Our results suggest that uncertainty and saving are both important. We find that workers value health insurance well in excess of its actuarial cost, and that access to health insurance has a significant effect on retirement behavior, which is consistent with the empirical evidence. As a result, shifting the Medicare eligibility age to 67 would cause a significant retirement delay - as large as the delay from shifting the Social Security normal retirement age from 65 to 67.

"Housing Wealth and Retirement Timing" Free Download


Michigan Retirement Research Center Research Paper No. UM WP 2007-172

MARTIN FARNHAM, University of Victoria - Economics
Email: mfarnham@uvic.ca
PURVI SEVAK, Hunter College
Email: psevak@hunter.cuny.edu

We use data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Office of Housing Enterprise Oversight to measure the effect of changes in housing wealth on retirement timing. Using cross-MSA variation in house-price movements to identify wealth effects on retirement timing, we find evidence that such wealth effects are present. According to some specifications the rate of transition into retirement increases in the presence of positive housing wealth shocks. In addition, we use data on expected age of retirement to measure the impact of housing wealth shocks on expectations about retirement timing. Using renters as a control for heterogeneity in local amenities and using individual fixed effects to control for unobserved individual heterogeneity, we find that a 10% increase in housing wealth is associated with a reduction in expected retirement age of between 3.5 and 5 months.

"The Retirement Consumption Puzzle: Actual Spending Change in Panel Data" Fee Download


NBER Working Paper No. W13929

MICHAEL D. HURD, The RAND Corporation, SUNY at Stony Brook University, College of Arts and Science, Department of Economics, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Email: mhurd@RAND.ORG
SUSANN ROHWEDDER, The RAND Corporation
Email: Susannr@rand.org

The simple one-good model of life-cycle consumption requires that consumption be continuous over retirement; yet prior research based on partial measures of consumption or on synthetic panels indicates that spending drops at retirement, a result that has been called the retirement-consumption puzzle. Using panel data on total spending, nondurable spending and food spending, we find that spending declines at small rates over retirement, at rates that could be explained by mechanisms such as the cessation of work-related expenses, unexpected retirement due to a health shock or by the substitution of time for spending. In the low-wealth population where spending did decline at higher rates, the main explanation for the decline appears to be a high rate of early retirement due to poor health. We conclude that at the population level there is no retirement consumption puzzle in our data, and that in subpopulations where there were substantial declines, conventional economic theory can provide the main explanation.