_________________________________________________________________

               SOCIAL  SCIENCE  RESEARCH  NETWORK

 E M P L O Y E E   B E N E F I T S ,   C O M P E N S A T I O N
                   &   P E N S I O N   L A W
                Vol. 7, No. 24: August 24, 2006

Editors:     PAMELA J. PERUN
               Urban Institute
               PAMELA@PLANETNOW.COM
_________________________________________________________________

BROWSE all abstracts in this subject:
http://www.ssrn.com/link/benefits-compensation-pension-law.html

SEARCH entire eLibrary at: http://ssrn.com/search

If this document is misaligned, please set type face to a 
 non-proportional font such as Courier 10. 
_________________________________________________________________

                      Topic of This Issue:
            International Perspectives on Retirement
_________________________________________________________________

T A B L E    O F    C O N T E N T S

"US Retirement Income System"
     LAWRENCE H. THOMPSON
         Urban Institute

"Retirement Expectations, Pension Reforms, and Their Impact on
 Private Wealth Accumulation"
     RENATA BOTTAZZI
         Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS)
     TULLIO JAPPELLI
         Università degli Studi di Salerno - Centre for Studies
         in Economics and Finance (CSEF), Centre for Economic
         Policy Research (CEPR), European Corporate Governance
         Institute (ECGI)
     MARIO PADULA
         Università degli Studi di Salerno - Centre for Studies
         in Economics and Finance (CSEF)

"Retirement in the UK"
     JAMES BANKS
         Institute for Fiscal Studies & University College
     SARAH SMITH
         Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), University of
         Bristol

"The Chilean Pension Reform Turns 25: Lessons from the Social
 Protection Survey"
     OLIVIA S. MITCHELL
         University of Pennsylvania - Insurance & Risk Management
         Department, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
     ALBERTO ARENAS DEMESA
         University of Chile
     DAVID BRAVO
         University of Chile
     JERE R. BEHRMAN
         University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
     PETRA TODD
         University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics,
         National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER),

"The Swedish Experience with Pension Reform"
     ANNIKA E. SUNDÉN
         Stockholm University - Swedish Institute for Social
         Research (SOFI)

"Early Retirement, Social Security and Well-Being in Germany"
     AXEL H. BÖRSCH-SUPAN
         University of Mannheim - Department of Economics,
         National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Centre for
         Economic Policy Research (CEPR)
     HENDRIK JÜRGES
         University of Mannheim - Mannheim Research Institute for
         the Economics of Aging (MEA)
_________________________________________________________________

"US Retirement Income System"
     Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp.
     95-112, 2006
     

  Contact:  LAWRENCE H. THOMPSON
              Urban Institute
    Email:  LTHOMPSO@UI.URBAN.ORG
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=257704

Full Text:  http://ssrn.com/abstract=906506

ABSTRACT: In the United States, retirement income is supplied
through the combination of a relatively modest, contributory
social insurance programme; employer-provided (increasingly
defined contribution savings) programmes; and individual
retirement savings. The public programme supplies the vast
majority of the income of the poorer half of the aged population;
only the richest 20 per cent receive more from employer plans
than from the public programme. Projections show that the public
programme will have financial problems in the 2030s. Thereafter,
revenues would have to be increased by a third or benefits cut by
a quarter to restore financial balance. Despite widespread angst
about the impact of longer lifespans and the retirement of the
baby-boom generation, however, there is little serious discussion
about how either the public- or private-sector programmes should
be adjusted. In 2005, President Bush failed to generate
significant public support for a plan partially to privatize the
public-sector programme.
______________________________

"Retirement Expectations, Pension Reforms, and Their Impact on
 Private Wealth Accumulation"
     CFS Working Paper No. 2006/10
     

  Contact:  RENATA BOTTAZZI
              Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS)
    Email:  renata_b@ifs.org.uk
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=482077

Co-Author:  TULLIO JAPPELLI
              Università degli Studi di Salerno - Centre for
              Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), Centre for
              Economic Policy Research (CEPR), European Corporate
              Governance Institute (ECGI)
    Email:  tullioj@tin.it
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=31881

Co-Author:  MARIO PADULA
              Università degli Studi di Salerno - Centre for
              Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF)
    Email:  mpadula@unisa.it
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=328841

 Abstract:  http://ssrn.com/abstract=906999

ABSTRACT: We estimate the effect of pension reforms on
households' expectations of retirement outcomes and private
wealth accumulation decisions exploiting a decade of intense
Italian pension reforms as a source of exogenous variation in
expected pension wealth. The Survey of Household Income and
Wealth, a large random sample of the Italian population, elicits
expectations of the age at which workers expect to retire and of
the ratio of pension benefits to pre-retirement income between
1989 and 2002. We find that workers have revised expectations in
the direction suggested by the reform and that there is
substantial offset between private wealth and perceived pension
wealth, particularly by workers that are better informed about
their pension wealth.
______________________________

"Retirement in the UK"
     Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 40-56,
     2006
     

  Contact:  JAMES BANKS
              Institute for Fiscal Studies & University College
    Email:  J.W.BANKS@UCL.AC.UK
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=82390

Co-Author:  SARAH SMITH
              Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), University of
              Bristol
    Email:  S.L.Smith@lse.ac.uk
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=336398

Full Text:  http://ssrn.com/abstract=906424

ABSTRACT: In common with other OECD countries, the UK experienced
more than two decades of declining labour-market activity among
older men from the 1970s to the early 1990s, a trend that has
only recently shown signs of being reversed. Retirement decisions
are heavily shaped by institutional context and in the UK this
has led to there being two distinct groups with very different
"retirement" experiences. At the top of the wealth distribution,
early retirement has typically been influenced by private,
occupational pensions; at the bottom of the wealth distribution
individuals are even more likely to be not working in their 50s,
but do not typically define themselves as retired, and draw on
income support, or more usually, disability benefits.
Policy-makers keen to increase effective retirement ages will
need to consider the very different circumstances of these two
groups.
______________________________

"The Chilean Pension Reform Turns 25: Lessons from the Social
 Protection Survey"
     PRC Working Paper No. 2006-9
     

  Contact:  OLIVIA S. MITCHELL
              University of Pennsylvania - Insurance & Risk
              Management Department, National Bureau of Economic
              Research (NBER)
    Email:  mitchelo@wharton.upenn.edu
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=41556

Co-Author:  ALBERTO ARENAS DEMESA
              University of Chile
    Email:  aarenas@dipres.gob.cl
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=642893

Co-Author:  DAVID BRAVO
              University of Chile
    Email:  dbravo@decon.facea.uchile.cl
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=24357

Co-Author:  JERE R. BEHRMAN
              University of Pennsylvania - Department of
              Economics
    Email:  jbehrman@econ.upenn.edu
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=142109

Co-Author:  PETRA TODD
              University of Pennsylvania - Department of
              Economics, National Bureau of Economic Research
              (NBER),
    Email:  PTODD@ECON.UPENN.EDU
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=55282

Full Text:  http://ssrn.com/abstract=908988

ABSTRACT: In 1980, Chile dramatically reformed its retirement
system, replacing what was an old insolvent PAYGO program with a
new structure that relies heavily on funded defined contribution
individual accounts. In addition, eligibility and benefit
requirements were standardized, and a safety net for old-age
poverty was strengthened. Twenty-five years after this reform,
the Chilean model is being re-assessed, in terms of coverage,
contribution, investment, and retirement benefit outcomes. This
paper introduces a recently-developed longitudinal survey of
individual respondents in Chile, the Social Protection Survey (or
Encuesta de Previsión Social, EPS), and illustrates some uses of
this survey for microeconomic analysis of key aspects of the
Chilean system.
______________________________

"The Swedish Experience with Pension Reform"
     Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp.
     133-148, 2006
     

  Contact:  ANNIKA E. SUNDÉN
              Stockholm University - Swedish Institute for Social
              Research (SOFI)
    Email:  annika.sunden.1@bc.edu
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=44117

Full Text:  http://ssrn.com/abstract=906508

ABSTRACT: Sweden is one of few countries in Europe to have
introduced a comprehensive pension reform. In 1998, Sweden passed
legislation that transformed its public pension system to a
notional defined-contribution (NDC) plan - that is, a
defined-contribution plan financed on a pay-as-you-go basis. In
addition, a second tier of funded individual accounts was
introduced. The reform had broad political support with more than
80 percent of the votes in parliament. This paper discusses the
trends in retirement in Sweden and assesses the experience with
pension reform. The objective was to design a fiscally
sustainable system tied to economic growth with a clear link
between contributions and benefits. We discuss the challenges in
meeting this goal, the extent to which the Swedish reform has
succeeded, and how the system affects beneficiaries. The paper
evaluates the experience of the individual funded accounts to
date and concludes with an outlook for the future.
______________________________

"Early Retirement, Social Security and Well-Being in Germany"
     NBER Working Paper No. W12303
     

  Contact:  AXEL H. BÖRSCH-SUPAN
              University of Mannheim - Department of Economics,
              National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Centre
              for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)
    Email:  ABS@ECON.UNI-MANNHEIM.DE
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=234674

Co-Author:  HENDRIK JÜRGES
              University of Mannheim - Mannheim Research
              Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA)
    Email:  juerges@mea.uni-mannheim.de
Auth-Page:  http://ssrn.com/author=341882

Full Text:  http://ssrn.com/abstract=910835

ABSTRACT: This paper investigates the relation between early
retirement and well-being using the GSOEP panel data. The general
picture that emerges from our analysis is that early retirement
as such seems to be related to subjective well-being, in fact
more so than normal retirement. Early retirement most probably is
a reaction to a health shock. Individuals are less happy in the
year of early retirement than in the years before and after
retirement. After retirement, individuals attain their
pre-retirement satisfaction levels after a relatively short
while. Hence, the early retirement effect on well-being appears
to be negative and short-lived rather than positive and long.
Whether this is an effect of retirement itself or a psychological
adaptation to an underlying shock cannot be identified in our
data and remains an open research issue waiting for a more
objective measurement of health.
____________________________